Institutional Repository

The decision-usefulness of corporate environmental reports in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wingard, H. C.
dc.contributor.advisor Cronje, Christo Johannes
dc.contributor.author Kamala, Peter Nasiema
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-03T05:59:42Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-03T05:59:42Z
dc.date.issued 2014-11
dc.identifier.citation Kamala, Peter Nasiema (2014) The decision-usefulness of corporate environmental reports in South Africa, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18677> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18677
dc.description.abstract The broad aim of this research was to assess the decision-usefulness of environmental reports produced by South African companies that are listed on the Johanessburg Securities Exchange (JSE) to users of the reports. The study was motivated by a lack of research on the decision-usefulness of environmental reports in South Africa. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase in form of a content analysis evaluated the decision-usefulness of the environmental reports of top 100 JSE-listed South African companies using a control list and a judgement scale. The second phase in form of a questionnaire survey was aimed at determining, the information needs of users of environmental reports produced by South African companies (that are listed on the JSE), the extent to which they read and employ the reports for making decisions. In addition, this phase was meant to ascertain the degree of users' satisfaction with the decision-usefulness of the environmental reports as well as elicit their suggestions on ways of improving the reports. Furthermore, the second phase was aimed at determining the users’ perception of the relative importance of environmental reports as well as ascertaining whether there was an expectation gap between the users and the preparers of the reports with regard to their decision-usefulness. The results of the content analysis phase of the study indicate that the environmental reports of the sampled companies were decision-useful, however their decision-usefulness varied widely. Although decision-useful, the environmental reports of the sampled companies were not comparable. In addition, the environmental reports of companies from sectors with a significant impact on the environment, and those of large companies were more decision-useful than the reports of companies from sectors with an insignificant impact on the environment and those of smaller companies. The results of the questionnaire survey phase of the study indicate that users prefer balanced environmental reports that disclose both negative and positive aspects that identify and describe key relevant issues, that are specific and contain accurate information, and that provide future oriented information. In addition, users prefer environmental reports that identify and address key stakeholders and their concerns, demonstrate the integration of environmental issues into core business processes, and that compare quantitative impacts against best practice. Furthermore, the results also indicate that users do read environmental reports, mostly from companies’ websites Portable Document Format (PDF) annual reports and that they mostly use the environmental reports for research, their own knowledge, and to hold companies accountable. However, users are not fully satisfied with the decision-usefulness of the environmental reports as they feel that there is a need to improve the reports in order to make them more decision-useful. The results also indicate that users perceive environmental reports to be more important than any other type of reports, most notably the financial reports. Comparing the responses of the users to those of preparers on various issues pertaining to the decision-usefulness of environmental reports, significant differences were found between the views of the two groups. These differences provide ample evidence that is consistent with the existence of an environmental reporting expectation gap in South Africa. This study makes several original contributions to environmental reporting literature, most notable of which is that, it is the first study in the South African context to empirically evaluate the quality (decision-usefulness) of environmental reports in line with the accounting conceptual frameworks and the GRI guidelines combined. By so doing, the study introduces to the academic literature an extensive five dimensional qualitative characteristic framework for evaluating the quality (decision-usefulness) of environmental reports. In addition, the study uniquely employs the decision-usefulness theory to provide insights into the environmental reporting practices of South African companies that are listed on the JSE. In so doing, it re-contextualises the theory that is typically employed in explaining financial reporting, and demonstrates its applicability in explaining the decision-usefulness of the environmental reporting practices of South African companies that are listed on the JSE. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xviii, 485 leaves) : illustrations
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Decision-usefulness en
dc.subject Environmental reports en
dc.subject Environmental reporting en
dc.subject Sustainability reporting en
dc.subject Users en
dc.subject Preparers en
dc.subject Relevance en
dc.subject Reliability en
dc.subject Verifiability en
dc.subject Comparability en
dc.subject Understandability en
dc.subject Timeliness en
dc.subject Conceptual framework en
dc.subject Non-financial reporting en
dc.subject.ddc 658.40830968
dc.subject.lcsh Environmental reporting -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Environmental auditing -- South Africa en
dc.title The decision-usefulness of corporate environmental reports in South Africa en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.description.department Accounting en
dc.description.degree D. Com. (Accounting)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics